Please note: This is an archived project that is not currently being updated.
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is cells from the milk ducts that have become cancerous but have not spread. DCIS diagnoses have become much more common with increased mammography. Doctors have questioned the current aggressive treatment options, and intraductal evaluation and treatment options may be better options.

Background

  • DCIS diagnoses have increased greatly due to increased rates of mammography.
  • Surgery, radiation, and hormone therapy — the standard treatment for DCIS — have significant side effects and no impact on long-term survival.

Key points

  • Since only a portion of DCIS cases progress to invasive breast cancer, treatment plans need to be tailored to the individual by carefully evaluating risks on a case-by-case basis.
  • More research on less invasive, intraductal approaches will help provide additional options for those diagnosed with DCIS.

Parsemus' role

  • The Parsemus Foundation advocates for non-invasive and simple approaches to complex health issues, and supports the intraductal approach for preventing, evaluating and treating breast cancer.
  • To support individualized medicine, we provide educational information on DCIS so that informed health decisions can be made.
The Project in Detail

The Parsemus Foundation encourages research on simple approaches that could have a big impact, including the intraductal approach to early breast cancer — preventing, or eliminating, early cellular changes in the milk ducts (where the great majority of breast cancers start). When these changes are detected, the condition is called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) — the most common noninvasive lesion of the breast. With mammography becoming standard practice, the diagnosis of DCIS has skyrocketed, now accounting for over 20% of breast cancer diagnoses. Surgery, radiation, and hormone therapy are standard therapies, despite the fact that only a portion of DCIS cases progress to invasive cancer.

But scientists and physicians have been increasingly questioning the aggressive traditional treatment of DCIS. This pre-cancerous condition may be over-diagnosed and over treated in the U.S., and clinical trials have shown that while radiation and hormone therapy can reduce the risk of invasive recurrence, they have no effect on survival. There has been a call for tailoring the treatment to the woman, and carefully evaluating risks. Newer molecular profiling may serve to more effectively predict whether the condition will progress (see reviews by Feinberg and colleagues, 2018 and Barrio & Van Zee, 2017, and information on molecular evaluation by Nofech-Mozes et al, 2019).

Intraductal treatment of DCIS for breast cancer prevention and evaluation

Increasing evidence suggests that evaluating and even treating DCIS through the breast ducts can be an effective nonsurgical alternative. Dr. Susan Love has been an advocate of the intraductal approach for years, with research studies focused on mapping the breast ducts with 3D ultrasound. Ductal lavage, ductoscopy, and intraductal infusion of therapeutic agents may enhance breast cancer treatment. See details below.

  • Intraductal lavage involves flushing the mammary ducts and collecting the fluid for analysis of the cells. This method is becoming more common, especially for women at high risk of breast cancer. While the sensitivity required to detect abnormal cells visually is not ideal, evaluation of molecular indicators in the fluid is proving to be a useful diagnostic tool.
  • Mammary ductoscopy (threading a tiny endoscope into the breast ducts) is a noninvasive method that can help to visualize and sample lesions. Ductoscopes have been developed with fiber optics to aid visualization. This method can also be used to guide lumpectomy surgery, which helps to avoid the additional surgeries that may be required when lesions are missed with traditional methods.
  • Intraductal infusion is a method to put therapeutic agents directly into the duct system, where most breast cancers originate. It’s less likely to cause systemic toxicity since the physician is targeting a specific area. A number of clinical trials of intraductal chemotherapy have indicated the safety and feasibility of this method for breast cancer prevention.

If you or someone you know has been diagnosed with DCIS, review the references here to learn more about the risks and benefits of different treatment options. Be sure to ask your physician about molecular profiling (to determine if you are in a low-risk group) and intraductal approaches that might help you avoid more aggressive treatment options.

Relevant background studies

  • Balci FL, Feldman SM. (2014). Exploring breast with therapeutic ductoscopy. Gland Surg. 3(2): 136–141. (free full text — review article)
  • Barrio AV, Van Zee KJ. (2017). Controversies in the treatment of DCIS.  Annu Rev Med. 68:197-211. (free full text — review article)
  • Do Canto LM, et al. MicroRNA analysis of breast ductal fluid in breast cancer patients. (2016). Int J Oncol. 48(5): 2071–2078. (free full text)
  • Feinberg J, Wetstone R, Greenstein D, Borgen P. (2018). Is DCIS overrated? Cancer Treat Res. 173:53-72. (abstract)
  • Flanagan M, Love S, Shelley Hwang ES. (2010). Status of intraductal therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Curr Breast Cancer Rep, 2:75–82. (free full text — review article)
  • King BL, Love SM. (2006). The intraductal approach to the breast: raison d’être. Breast Cancer Res. 8(206 ). (free full text review).
  • Love SM, Zhang W, Gordon EJ, Rao J, Yang H, Li J, Zhang B, Wang X, Chen G, Zhang B. (2013).  A feasibility study of the intraductal administration of chemotherapy. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 6(1):51-8. (free full text — Phase I study of intraductal chemotherapy)
  • Mahoney ME, Gordon EJ, Rao JY, Jin Y, Hylton N, Love SM. (2013). Intraductal therapy of ductal carcinoma in situ: A presurgery study. Clin Breast Cancer. 13(4): 280–286. (free full text)
  • Murata S, Kominsky SL, Vali M, et al (2006). Ductal access for prevention and therapy of mammary tumors. Cancer Res, 66 (2): 638–645. (free full text)
  • Nofech-Mozes S, Hanna W, Rakovitch E. (2019). Molecular Evaluation of Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Oncotype DX DCIS. Am J Pathol. 189(5):975-980. (free full text)
  • Stearns V et al. (2011). Preclinical and clinical evaluation of intraductally administered agents in early breast cancer. Sci Transl Med. 26: 3(106). (free full text)
  • Wang T, Kumar A, Ding W et al.  (2022). Intraductal administration of transferrin receptor-targeted immunotoxin clears ductal carcinoma in situ in mouse models of breast cancer—a preclinical study. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 19(24) June 8, 2022. (abstract)
  • Zielinski J, Jaworski R, Irga-Jaworska N, Haponiuk I, Jaskiewicz J. (2015). The significance of ductoscopy of mammary ducts in the diagnostics of breast neoplasms. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 10(1): 79–86. (free full text)

Last updated on October 17, 2024

Many urologists have no knowledge of PEMF. I have full body PEMF mat, I have been lying on the mat for 30 minutes per day, in three weeks I have noticeable improvement in my BPH symptoms, reduced my bathroom visits by 50%.

Anonymous,June 2024

The electromagnetic treatment from the PEMF device produced a significant reduction (average 57%) in prostatic volume in three weeks of treatment.

Leoci et al.2014

The efficacy of PEMF (pulsed electromagnetic field therapy) on BPH in dogs, with no side effects, suggests the suitability of this treatment in humans and supports the hypothesis that impairment of blood supply to the lower urinary tract may be a causative factor in the development of BPH.

Leoci et al.2014

It would be great to have a new option such as pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for BPH. The preliminary study in an animal model is promising, but we need more research to determine how effective (and safe) this procedure would be in human men.

Alan ShindelMD

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is an important and under-recognized health issue for men. There is a great need for development of effective and safe alternatives to current treatment options.

Abraham MorgentalerMD, FACS
If you want us to respond remember to include your email address.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.